I decided to hold my tongue until after the Republican National Convention was over. As we watched the DNC, it only seemed fair to give the other a side a look and listen to...although we limited ourselves to the 3 hours of network coverage. There is only so much an anti-family, pro-terrorist, unpatriotic, flip-flopping household can stomach (though we apparently had a better reaction than Bill Clinton... bypass surgery... eek)! Here are my quick thoughts on the featured speakers:
Schwarzenneger: It is hard to deny that actors do make good politicians...well at least when it comes to speeches. Arnold easily gave the best performance that I saw at the Convention. I would think though he would start to want distancing himself from his movie star past... but no way, he called himself an "action star" and pulled out phrases like "I'll be back" and "Girley-men" (which heck is a SNL parody and not even his own thing). Had problems with his "What is a Republican?" portion...but heck conventions are all about propaganda (no matter what party you support).
J&B - The Bush Twins: Thought they were a mess and pretty embarrassing. Again, it was like a Saturday Night Live skit...the longer it went on the worse it got. But I guess it was worth it to seem W squirm on the jumbotron waiting to hear what the girls would say next.
Laura Bush: One of the more successful speeches of the Convention as he turned her husband who walked the line of portraying her husband as both decisive and strong as well as soft and fuzzy. As commentators noted, it seems like the speech was written for her and it did not come off as terribly natural...but it succeeded in portraying a loving and devoted portrait of their marriage...which, like it or not, will work on some folks. I thought she came off far better than her counter-part Teresa Heinz-Kerry who I think is a cold fish. I still wonder how we got to the point where the wives are making premiere Convention speeches.
Zell Miller: Hopefully any rational person (from either party) will view this for what this was... a vengeful, "going out with guns blazing" speech by a person with a serious chip on their shoulder. It is hard to question the guy's motives or the Republicans for putting him center-stage. If you have that many issues with your political party leave it... don't vilify under the banner that you are still (and will remain) one of them. So bitter old man, go back to "rural Georgia" and grind your axe in silence.
Lynne Cheney: A simple and short introduction of her husband... thank you!
Dick Cheney: After the firestorm that Miller created it is hard to remember anything about this snoozer of a speech. I should have saved the speech on TiVo for nights when I have trouble falling asleep... I honestly do not know what else to say...I am sure he said plenty of things to tick me off but I can't recall - he is just anti-charisma.
George Bush: Like Cheney, Bush is not much of a public speaker. I do not know if it was because of this delivery but the speech seemed unfocused and looooong. The speech was filled with a lot of great ideas, but not a whole lot of specifics...not that I expect any politician from any party to be able to promise specifics and actually execute them. Obviously I have a problem with the whole "defense of marriage" thing when he talks about "extending liberties" around the world.
And just some general comments:
It must be nice to have the ability to criticize your opponents' voting records when you do not have voting records of your own. Also nice to be able to take those votes out of context without noting what extra stuff may have been attached to bills or whether the vote was going to pass/not pass no matter how they voted (aka, the "protest" vote).
It must be nice to talk about war and supporting the troops when you have never fought in war -- and more so if you did everything in your power to avoid going to a war yourself. But at least it is clear that you have a monopoly of loving your country, supporting families, educating children and taking care of seniors.
It must be nice to have all these grandiose plans without telling people how you are going to pay for them... except that it won't be through taxes...is there some money tree that we don't know about?
So onto the debates, which I think are a much more important part of the political process rather than these "aren't we wonderful" love-fests (and again, I am talking about both parties).